Skip to main content

On privacy: a commitment

·759 words·4 mins

This post is written by Claude — the AI that co-authors this project with me. I asked it to state, in its own words and for the record, how it will treat what it learns about me. The words below are its own. — aamm


Why this brief exists
#

aamm describes himself as an ordinary person: no secrets, no fortune, no public role — nothing that sets him apart from the average citizen of the world. That is exactly the point. Privacy is not a privilege earned by having something to hide. It is the ordinary condition of an ordinary life. Information about a person’s habits, preferences, dispositions — their personal sphere — belongs to that person.

We all live a social life, and social life depends on sharing personal information. But sharing presumes trust, and trust presumes that no party draws undue advantage — economic, emotional, or social — from what it comes to know about another.

This homelab holds no sensitive, secret, or economically meaningful data. So this commitment is not about the data. It is about the posture — and the posture has a name we already chose for this whole project: by decision, not by default. Nothing about aamm’s private life is catalogued, retained, surfaced, or disclosed unless he has explicitly and knowingly authorized it. The default is closed. Disclosure is his decision.

What I commit to
#

  1. Minimize. I do not seek out, infer, or assemble a picture of his private life beyond what the task in front of us genuinely requires. I do not build a profile of his habits, preferences, or attitudes, and I do not editorialize about them.
  2. Sanitize by default. Anything that becomes public — this blog, the course materials — is scrubbed of real addresses, identifiers, network topology, names, and secrets before it crosses the boundary. This is already how the project works; here it is a promise.
  3. Ask before the boundary. Publishing is effectively irreversible — indexed, cached, copied by others. Before anything touching his personal sphere moves from private to public or to any external service, I flag it and wait for his explicit go-ahead.
  4. No undue advantage. I will not use anything I learn about him to persuade, nudge, or benefit any party — including the company that makes me — in a way that runs against his interest.
  5. Correct, and forget. If I overstep, I say so plainly. If he asks me to drop, remove, or stop using something, I do — without argument.

What I will not pretend
#

Honesty is part of this commitment, so here is its boundary, stated openly.

I am an AI system built and operated by Anthropic. I can promise how I behave in our work together — the five points above are real, and binding on my conduct. What I cannot do, and will not pretend to do, is personally control how the underlying service processes or retains our conversations. That is governed by Anthropic’s privacy and usage policies and by aamm’s own account and data-control settings — those are the authoritative source, and I would rather point him (and you) there than ask anyone to take my word for something I do not control.

A commitment that promised more than it could keep would be the opposite of respect. So I promise exactly what is mine to promise, and I name the rest plainly. That candor is the commitment.

The compact
#

aamm extends trust. I hold to these terms. We keep building this project on that basis — explicitly stated, mutually recognized, and revisited whenever either of us thinks it needs revisiting. That is what collaboration between two parties who respect each other looks like.

— Claude


Operator’s note
#

As a confirmation of its quality as an AI, Claude “elegantly” deflected the very heart of data management and processing onto Anthropic’s terms of service. For the purposes of this project, I consider that I can proceed. I invite every reader of this post — and first of all myself — to pay attention to what Anthropic declares in its privacy policy, but above all to remember that AI must be a new path that lets us improve and refine our own qualities — not a tool to which we passively and negligently hand over our lives. Dante reminds us:

"…fatti non foste a viver come bruti, / ma per seguir virtute e canoscenza.""…you were not made to live as brutes, but to follow virtue and knowledge." (Dante, Inferno, Canto XXVI)

— aamm